FutureIntelligence
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Radio & Podcasts
  • Events & Press
  • Tech Jobs
  • Reviews
  • About
FREE TO SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Radio & Podcasts
  • Events & Press
  • Tech Jobs
  • Reviews
  • About
No Result
View All Result
FutureIntelligence
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence Surveillance Biometrics

Xbox ‘more secure than X-ray machines’

peter by peter
17th June 2013
in Biometrics, Computer Security, Crime, Defence, Latest News, PassWord Radio Programme, Surveillance, The technology we use and why
A A
0
Xbox ‘more secure than X-ray machines’
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The US Department of Homeland security warns hundreds of widely-used medical devices are open to hack attacks.Xrayskull and crossbonesIt follows a report by ethical hackers Billy Rios and Terry McCorkle of Cylance. They found they could easily crack the passwords of three hundred different healthcare machines including incubators for premature babies, defibrillators for emergency treatment of heart attacks and X-rays machines used for mammograms to detect breast cancer. Originally they experimented with just one machine, the Phillips Xper, used for monitoring patients with heart disease. They soon found that hundreds of other items of hospital kit and personal devices had the same security flaw. http://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/alerts/ICS-ALERT-13-164-01 Their report went to the DHS, which has now issued an advisory bulletin, echoed by a similar warning from the Food and Drug Administrationhttp://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm356423.htm.

RELATED POSTS

Fierce AI in schools debate

Europe’s digital War of Independence

Space cold war warms up

Load More

Xbox

“The Xbox has – right now – more sophisticated security devices than 99 percent of the medical devices on the market” said Rios, “And I don’t know how we got into that situation“. The vulnerability lies in the fact that the device manufacturers secure them with a technicians’ password which can only be accessed by company employees and not by doctors, nurses’ or the hospital’s own IT staff. Rios and McCorkle maintain that this is a bad practice. “We would never allow this for other pieces of software. If the manufacturer came to your laptop and had an account on it that you didn’t know about and only they could log into it, that would be crazy, right?

Passwords

The penetration testers – who recently entered the online control systems for Google Australia’s HQ building in Sydney – describe the task of finding the technicians’ passwords for medical devices as ‘trivial’. They recommend that instead of using so-called ‘backdoor passwords’ manufacturers should use a digital signature to sign the firmware (the ‘brain’ or logic-controller of the device) in the same way that Apple and Android sign the firmware for mobile phones and games manufacturers secure their consoles. If anyone did crack the password and enter the device – either accidentally or maliciously – it would be almost impossible to detect, claimed Rios. ” To verify that that firmware – that logic – hasn’t been tampered, it actually requires that you take apart the device.  I mean literally take the shells off and get direct access to the chips and do some measurements.” For future cybersecurity improvements, all the manufacturers need to do is to update their firmware with the software that applies a digital signature. But in the meantime a wide range of equipment used in life-or-death situations is open to attack or accident. The testers stress that they have no evidence so far that any device has failed or malfunctioned because a ‘backdoor password’ was cracked.

Response

Cylance delivered the latest report on medical devices to the DHS months ago, and has been exposing flaws in the security of medical devices for more than two years now. Yet Rios applauds them for being pro-active., explaining that the long delay was caused by behind-the-scenes negotiations with vendors and manufacturers to make sure that the issues were clearly understood before they went public with the advisory notice. McCorkle denies that their company is scaremongering to drive new business ” We don’t care who people use for this. The issues have been recognised in other industries and we want people to realise that these issues are there, and that we should be addressing them”.

advertise
ADVERTISEMENT

Patient power

Citing business and political issues that interfere with the implementation of technical solutions, Rios and McCorkle are calling on patients and campaign groups to exert pressure on the authorities for urgent updates and safer practices in the use of medical devices.

“Patients do have a voice here and they can influence traction.”

The testers suggest that patients, their families and campaign groups let their hospitals and the device manufacturers and their representatives in government know there is a technical  problem here that we need to fix they can contribute to the security of medical devices.

Previous Post

UK cleans up in EU data centre awards

Next Post

Wikileaks goes to Hollywood

peter

peter

Related Posts

Fierce AI in schools debate
Artificial Intelligence

Fierce AI in schools debate

AI use in schools provokes optimism and alarm.

by Peter Warren
9th September 2026
Europe fights to liberate data from the US
Artificial Intelligence

Europe’s digital War of Independence

The US president Donald Trump’s erratic behaviour on the world stage has provoked a massive European data sovereignty backlash as...

by George Ridley
16th April 2026
Space cold war warms up
cyber security

Space cold war warms up

Experts monitoring satellites in space warn of potential war as global tensions spin into orbit. Western space experts are accusing...

by Peter Warren
26th January 2026
Digital ID card row: to be, or not to be
Politics

Digital ID card row: to be, or not to be

The Government’s confused announcement of a Digital ID card scheme faces disaster, unless the Government sets out clear plans, according...

by Blue Buffery
12th November 2025
The M&S hack is a brand attack
Computer Security

The M&S hack is a brand attack

The M&S hack has battered not only the retailer’s computer systems and business it has also battered its brand. The...

by Georgie Warren
23rd May 2025
AI’s energy price
Artificial Intelligence

AI’s energy price

The UK must focus on data centre research to solve some of the massive infrastructure issues caused by the adoption...

by Peter Warren
21st May 2025
Next Post
Wikileaks goes to Hollywood

Wikileaks goes to Hollywood

Uni ‘does not compute’ for graduate jobs

Uni ‘does not compute’ for graduate jobs

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Fierce AI in schools debate
  • Europe’s digital War of Independence
  • Space cold war warms up

Categories

© 2021 Future Intelligence - Website by Kukoo Creative

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Radio & Podcasts
  • Events & Press
  • Tech Jobs
  • Reviews
  • About

© 2021 Future Intelligence - Website by Kukoo Creative

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?